Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Pediatrics ; 149, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2003284

ABSTRACT

Purpose/Objectives: Understand the rates of pediatric obesity in the Inland Empire of Southern California, in the context of COVID quarantine, to improve counseling and treatment of these patients. Design/Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on all patients seen at a FQHC in Southern California. Patients between 5 and 18, who had a clinic visit between 6/1/2020 to 7/31/2020 for a well-child visit, with at least one other well-child visit in calendar year 2019 and 2018 were included. Patients with congenital heart disease, short gut syndrome, ADHD on stimulant medications, G tube dependence, diseases affecting growth or stature, complex syndromes (CHARGE, VACTERL, DiGeorge), syndromes affected growth, oncologic conditions, intellectual disability, transplant recipients, incomplete BMI data or malnutrition (BMI Z score <= -1) were excluded. BMI values, Z-scores, and percentiles, as well as relative changes from 2018 to 2019, and 2019 to 2020 were analyzed using one-way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc test. Results: There was a statistical difference in BMI between years as determined by a one-way ANOVA (F(2,509) = 2.811, P = 0.05). A Tukey post hoc test revealed that the BMI of students in 2020 was statistically higher (19.87.65, p = 0.05) compared to the BMI in 2018 (18.25.71). There was no statistical difference in BMI between 2020 and 2019, and 2019 and 2018 (Figure 1). When groups were stratified into morbidly obese (BMI >= 99%), obese (BMI >=95% & <99%), overweight (BMI >=85% & <95%), and healthy weight (BMI >=5% & < 85%), patients who were not at a healthy weight increased from 36.8% in 2018 to 40.4% in 2019, to 44.7% in 2020 (Figure 2). As shown in the SANKEY diagram (Figure 3), while there was an initial decline in morbidly obese patients in 2018 to 2019 (-8.3%), there was a relatively large increase from 2019 to 2020 (+45.5%). From 2018 to 2019, 75 out of 141 patients (53.2%) had a decrease in BMI, while in 2019 to 2020 there were 56 out of 141 patients (39.7%) who had a decrease in BMI. Out of the 75 patients who had a decrease in BMI from 2018 to 2019, 49 (65.3%) had a rebound increase in BMI from 2019 to 2020. Conclusion/Discussion: There was a significant increase in overall BMI from 2018 to 2020 with an overall increase in patients who fall into the obese and overweight categories in 2020. 65.3% of patients who had a decreasing BMI from 2018 to 2019 have a rebound increase in BMI in 2020. This can likely be contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic and stay-at-home orders leading to a more sedentary lifestyle. More research should be performed to elicit multifactorial (physical activity, diet, and psychosocial factors) etiology of the worsening obesity epidemic during the COVID-19 pandemic.

2.
Sleep ; 45(SUPPL 1):A353, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1927444

ABSTRACT

Introduction: A 19-year-old non-verbal male with history of CHARGE syndrome, severe autism, intellectual disability, coloboma with blindness OD and severely imparied vision OS, deafness, self-injurious and aggressive behavior, Tetralogy of Fallot status post repair, pulmonary valve replacement, hypertension, hypothyroidism, megacolon, gastrostomy tube dependence, eosinophilic esophagitis and chronic kidney disease with an irregular sleep cycle who has failed multiple medications for insomnia has shown treatment success with suvorexant. Report of Cases: This patient's sleep schedule ranges from 1.5 to 5 hour segments at various times of day or night including naps at school with occasional longer periods of sleep up to 10 hours and longer periods of wakefulness up to 22 hours who has been treated with the following medications: trazodone, clonidine, hydroxyzine, diphenhydramine, quetiapine, gabapentin, mirtazapine, eszopiclone, melatonin and ramelteon. His behavioral problems have been treated with olanzapine. He continued to be aggressive and difficult to direct. His parents reported exhaustion. Then, suvorexant 5mg was added at bedtime while the following sleep medications were continued: gabapentin total daily dose of 1500mg (300mg in morning and 3pm;900mg at bedtime, 300mg one hour later if still awake), ramelteon 8mg, mirtazapine 7.5mg and olanzapine 10mg at bedtime and bid prn aggressive behavior. He also takes the following daily medications: bisacodyl, polyethylene glycol, simethicone, hyoscyamine, cholecalciferol, aspirin, levothyroxine, hypoallergenic nutritional formula, starch and albuterol prn. With the addition of suvorexant 5mg, he had been able to get 9.5 hours of consolidated sleep at night with improvement in his behavior until he contracted Covid-19 and regressed. The suvorexant dose was increased to 10mg which again improved his insomnia and behavior. Conclusion: Various medications have either not worked at all or have worked suboptimally for insomnia in this medically complex patient who has an irregular Circadian rhythm disorder. Adding an orexin receptor antagonist as a novel mechanism to his regimen has shown promise. At this time, this patient has been stable for one month with suvorexant 10mg at bedtime after regression on the 5mg dose that coincided with a Covid-19 infection. We are proceeding with cautious optimism.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL